don't ignore reordered ACKs

This commit is contained in:
Marten Seemann
2019-02-11 15:30:40 +08:00
parent 631947ad7d
commit b35c161f2e
2 changed files with 1 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@@ -30,8 +30,7 @@ type sentPacketHandler struct {
nextSendTime time.Time
largestAcked protocol.PacketNumber
largestReceivedWithAck protocol.PacketNumber
largestAcked protocol.PacketNumber
// lowestNotConfirmedAcked is the lowest packet number that we sent an ACK for, but haven't received confirmation, that this ACK actually arrived
// example: we send an ACK for packets 90-100 with packet number 20
// once we receive an ACK from the peer for packet 20, the lowestNotConfirmedAcked is 101
@@ -176,12 +175,6 @@ func (h *sentPacketHandler) ReceivedAck(ackFrame *wire.AckFrame, withPacketNumbe
return qerr.Error(qerr.InvalidAckData, "Received ACK for an unsent package")
}
// duplicate or out of order ACK
if withPacketNumber != 0 && withPacketNumber < h.largestReceivedWithAck {
h.logger.Debugf("Ignoring ACK frame (duplicate or out of order).")
return nil
}
h.largestReceivedWithAck = withPacketNumber
h.largestAcked = utils.MaxPacketNumber(h.largestAcked, largestAcked)
if !h.packetNumberGenerator.Validate(ackFrame) {